California can lead on PFAS reform—but not with SB 682

OPINION – At a time when California’s global economic leadership is under pressure, we cannot afford to adopt sweeping policies that put entire industries at risk without clear, science-based justification. Yet that’s exactly what Senate Bill 682 (Allen) threatens to do. Reintroduced this year without addressing previous critical concerns from legislators and stakeholders, SB 682 would create a vague and overly broad regulatory framework that could put California’s economy at risk.

SB 682 seeks to ban the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of any consumer products containing intentionally added PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), including in processes where they are used safely and are considered essential by federal standards. While the intent to protect public health is commendable, the bill’s current language ignores real-world applications and consequences. It casts such a wide net that it would effectively ban a range of products—including some cookware, dental floss, cleaning products, and food packaging—all items which many Californians consider critical to daily life and are vital sectors of our economy.

The California Manufacturers & Technology Association (CMTA), the leading voice for a sector that supports our $4 trillion economy, strongly opposes this manufacturer-breaking bill. California manufacturers are not seeking exemptions; we are demanding clarity. Our industry has invested billions in cleaner technologies and safer chemical processes. We believe in regulation that protects public health while allowing manufacturers to innovate, grow, and create good-paying jobs.

PFAS are used in the safe production of semiconductors, aerospace communication devices, automotive components like batteries and fuel lines, construction materials, food packaging, and even life-saving medical devices. These are not fringe products. They are the foundation of California’s innovation economy and infrastructure. The Environmental Protection Agency itself has acknowledged that, when used properly, certain PFAS serve critical functions in a safe and cost-effective way.

For manufacturers currently working to comply with Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws, this bill would inhibit those efforts due to its broad regulatory framework and rigidity. As manufacturers attempt to adhere to evolving regulations, we cannot risk further stress to a vital industry already facing uncertainty.

SB 682 would also exacerbate California’s housing crisis. Construction materials that rely on PFAS for safety and durability would be restricted, delaying progress on desperately needed housing projects. Our agricultural exports, which are crucial to both California’s economy and the global food supply, could face setbacks from material bans that competitors abroad aren’t facing. The healthcare industry could also experience significant setbacks without access to critical products and equipment.

As California aims to be a leader in artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing, the timing of this bill could not be worse. Banning key PFAS applications would hinder the very technologies driving our future, including the semiconductors and high-performance computing systems powering AI. Likewise, with the automotive industry beginning to reshore operations, California’s inconsistent regulatory approach sends a troubling signal to investors.

We must regulate PFAS thoughtfully, guided by science and feasibility—not with vague mandates that leave manufacturers guessing and consumers footing the bill. Even the European Union, known for strict environmental regulations, has paused and reconsidered aspects of its PFAS restrictions due to implementation challenges and policy complications.

If California wants to continue to lead, it should lead with intention. In these economically uncertain times, we need policies that foster innovation, protect health, and ensure our industries can compete on the global stage. SB 682, as currently written, is not that policy. Lawmakers must go back to the drawing board and pursue solutions that protect people without paralyzing progress.

Lance Hastings is President & CEO of the California Manufacturing & Technology Association.